Skip to content

Soil testing guide

Atterberg limits: liquid limit, plastic limit and PI

By Last reviewed:

Key takeaways

  • LL and PL are operationally defined index properties, not field-strength measurements.
  • Multipoint LL uses a least-squares flow line against log10 of blow count.
  • PI = LL − PL, calculated from unrounded values.
  • The linked D4318 catalog edition is marked withdrawn; verify the current edition.

Try it: atterberg limits calculator

The same calculator as the free tool. Runs in your browser; nothing is saved.

Open the full atterberg limits calculator page

Atterberg limits describe water contents associated with changes in the behavior of fine-grained soil. ASTM D4318 covers liquid limit, plastic limit and plasticity index measurements. The results help characterize a sample and support classification; they are not direct measurements of field strength or a replacement for project-specific geotechnical testing.

What are liquid and plastic limits?

The liquid limit is the water content at which soil changes from a plastic to a liquid state under the method's defined test condition. The plastic limit is the water content at which a rolled soil thread crumbles at about 1/8 in (3.2 mm) diameter. These are operationally defined laboratory limits, not sharp transitions that can be seen in every field sample.

Plasticity index is PI = LL − PL. It describes the range between the two measured limits when both are valid. If the plastic limit cannot be determined, or PL is at least LL, the soil is reported as non-plastic under the verified facts here. Always record whether the result is NP rather than entering a zero that could be mistaken for a numerical value.

Liquid limit flow curveWater content decreases as blow count increases on a log scale; the liquid limit is read at 25 blows.Number of blows (log scale)Water content, %25 blowsLL
Liquid-limit data form a flow curve; the fitted water content at 25 blows is the LL.

How is a multipoint liquid limit obtained?

The multipoint method collects water-content results at different blow counts, then evaluates water content against the logarithm of blow count. A least-squares flow line is fitted and the liquid limit is read at 25 blows. Because the horizontal axis is logarithmic, equal horizontal distances represent ratios of blow counts rather than equal additive steps.

The quality of the fit depends on valid, distinct trials and careful moisture measurements. Record each blow count with its corresponding specimen water content, retain the raw data, and inspect the plotted points for inconsistency. Do not remove a point just because it changes the final value; investigate whether a procedural or transcription issue explains the difference and follow the lab's controlled rule for invalid observations.

How is the plastic limit determined?

For the plastic-limit portion, the operator works prepared soil into threads and records the moisture content at the method-defined crumbling endpoint. The task requires consistent judgment and handling; repeat trials help show whether the result is stable. Keep the specimen identity and individual trial values rather than preserving only a final average.

The endpoint is not a visual estimate of when soil feels dry. Use the method's apparatus and current instructions, and record unusual texture or sample behavior. If a valid plastic limit cannot be established, report NP as specified rather than forcing an average from unsuitable trials. A result near LL deserves careful review because it can change whether PI is meaningful.

How should the plasticity index and chart be read?

Calculate PI from the unrounded LL and PL values, then plot LL horizontally and PI vertically on the plasticity chart. The A-line separates broad clay-like and silt-like group behavior in the USCS decision process. The U-line is an upper reference; it is not a soil group boundary that replaces other checks.

Classification depends on the plotted values, soil type and the complete ASTM D2487 rules. A point close to a line should be reviewed with the original trials and full chart rather than interpreted solely from a rounded display. Atterberg limits describe index behavior; they do not alone establish compressibility, shear strength, shrink-swell potential or suitability for a particular fill.

How do sample preparation and moisture affect results?

A representative sample must be prepared using the applicable standard and project instructions. Mixing, drying, particle-size preparation and the amount of water added can affect how the material behaves during the test. Maintain traceability from the original sample through the prepared portions used for liquid and plastic limit trials.

Moisture determinations should be tied to the appropriate portion and method. Evaporation, inconsistent mixing or a sample that has been contaminated can shift measured water content. Use clean tools, protect prepared soil from moisture loss and record the preparation route so a later reviewer can understand the result rather than assuming every material behaved identically.

What can Atterberg limits tell you about a soil?

They help distinguish plasticity behavior and support fine-grained USCS classification. They are useful for comparing samples, identifying changes between strata or borrow sources, and deciding whether additional tests are needed. A change in LL or PI may signal a material difference that merits review, but its engineering significance depends on the design question and other evidence.

Do not use the limits as a stand-alone pass/fail test unless a project specification explicitly applies a threshold. The limits do not directly measure in-place moisture, density or strength. Report the method and values, then let the geotechnical engineer interpret them with gradation, field descriptions and the project model.

What formulas are used?

  1. 01PI = LL − PL
  2. 02Multipoint LL is the fitted water content at 25 blows on a logarithmic blow-count axis

What does a worked example look like?

Inputs

Liquid-limit trials: (35 blows, 28.0%), (25, 30.0%), (16, 32.5%). Plastic-limit trials: 18.2% and 18.6%.

Result

Shared regression returns LL 30.0%, PL 18.4%, and PI 11.6%.

Calculated by the same tested functions as the ProofGrit free calculators.

How should unexpected Atterberg results be reviewed?

Check sample identity, preparation, individual trial data, moisture measurements and units before recalculating. Plot all valid points and inspect their pattern. A questionable point should lead to a documented investigation and the lab's procedure for invalid trials, not an undocumented deletion that makes the line look smoother.

Compare the result with the sample description and other index data, but do not change it merely to match expectations. If the material is non-plastic or the plastic limit cannot be determined, use the proper NP notation. When values are near a classification boundary, review the unrounded data against the full current chart.

What are common Atterberg-limit mistakes?

Common errors include pairing a water content with the wrong blow count, mixing trials from different sample portions, fitting the wrong axis scale, averaging plastic-limit trials before checking their validity, and reporting PI when PL is not valid. Early rounding can also move a plotted point across a chart line.

Retain every trial and use a single validated calculation path. Show the flow curve, the evaluated 25-blow result and the plastic-limit replicate values. Clearly mark NP and explain any excluded trial under the controlled procedure. These practices make the classification traceable and reduce disputes about a result that sits near a decision boundary.

Which standards relate to Atterberg limits?

ASTM D4318 covers liquid limit, plastic limit and plasticity index. The catalog page linked here is for a historical edition marked withdrawn, so confirm the currently applicable edition before using it. ASTM D2487 uses these properties in the Unified Soil Classification System.

The standards index links to D4318 and the USCS guide. This page is an original summary and does not reproduce test procedures or tables. Follow the current publisher document, the lab's controlled method and project requirements.

See the standards index for every standard covered on this site.

Frequently asked questions

What does the liquid limit measure?

It is the water content associated with the method-defined transition from plastic to liquid behavior.

How is the liquid limit read in the multipoint method?

Fit water content against log blow count, then evaluate the line at 25 blows.

How do you calculate PI?

Subtract plastic limit from liquid limit: PI = LL − PL.

When is soil reported NP?

When PL cannot be determined or PL is greater than or equal to LL, report non-plastic as the method directs.

Are Atterberg limits strength tests?

No. They are index-property measurements that support description and classification.

How ProofGrit helps

ProofGrit's Atterberg calculator keeps liquid-limit trials, plastic-limit measurements and the resulting chart in one browser workflow. The lab remains responsible for sample preparation, method compliance and final classification against the current standard.

This guide is a plain-English summary. Always follow the current standard and your project specifications.